Difference between revisions of "Migrating OTB Applications to Monteverdi"

From OTBWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by Ulofyvy (Talk); changed back to last version by Patrick)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
>Some OTB-Applications haven't been moved to Monteverdi module.
+
Some OTB-Applications haven't been moved to Monteverdi module.
 
Here is the list :
 
Here is the list :
 
* Object Counting  
 
* Object Counting  
Line 31: Line 31:
 
and
 
and
 
* QuickLoock
 
* QuickLoock
 
----
 
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
 
----
 
=[http://yzolynali.co.cc Page Is Unavailable Due To Site Maintenance, Please Visit Reserve Copy Page]=
 
----
 
=[http://yzolynali.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
 
----
 
</div>
 

Latest revision as of 18:27, 19 November 2010

Some OTB-Applications haven't been moved to Monteverdi module. Here is the list :

  • Object Counting
  • Segmentation
  • Stereoscopic Application
  • FineRegistration
  • ImageToDBRegistration
  • LandCover
  • Pireo : not MVC.
  • RoadExtraction
  • UrbanAreaExtraction
  • QuickLook : command line exe.

in this list, some applications can be a real plus for Monteverdi :

  • Urban Are Extraction
  • FineRegistration
  • RoadExtraction

and

  • QuickLoock


A choice has to be done : Do we move some of them? If yes, which one? Do we wait to eventually change FLTK to Qt?

Most interesting one are :

  • Polarimetric Synthesis (the only RADAR/SAR application)
  • Urban Are Extraction
  • FineRegistration
  • RoadExtraction

and

  • QuickLoock